Principle 11 of the act requires entities to take active measures to ensure the security of personal information it holds and to actively consider whether it is permitted to retain personal information. The principles would require political parties to do due diligence to ensure they are only collecting necessary personal information, as well as handling it in accordance with the protections offered by the act. It argues that by extending the Privacy Act to cover political parties, they would need to meet the requirements of the Australian privacy principles, which would reduce the possible consequence of any future data breach. The submission pointed to cyber-attacks on major political parties in 2019 which it said narrowly avoided a data breach that would have caused “unimaginable damage”. Without appropriate safeguards in place, unregulated access and use of Australians’ personal information creates a concerning gap in Australia’s approach to cybersecurity, putting not just individuals at risk, but also our digital security more broadly.” “This stands to weaken our democratic processes and undermine public trust. Access key data such as traffic throughput, TCP connections, and protocols Intuitive dashboards and reports with macro and micro views. “These harms include invasions of privacy, voter manipulation, and misinformation and disinformation,” it states. Guardian reduces OT risks for the largest critical infrastructure, energy, manufacturing, mining, transportation, building automation and other OT sites. The Digital Rights Watch submission said the use of technology to collect voter data increases “the scale and scope by which harm can be caused to everyday Australians through inappropriate or invasive collection, use and disclosure of their personal information”. Sign up to receive an email with the top stories from Guardian Australia every morning Political parties are able to access the electoral roll – which includes the name, address, date of birth and gender of each voter – and use this, along with any other personal information they may have collected, to send postal vote applications and political messaging. “It is reasonable and expected for political parties to collect and use personal information of voters for this purpose … however, these practices should be subject to the limitations and protections contained in those Acts to ensure that they are lawful, transparent and respectful.” “Digital Rights Watch recognises the legitimate need for political parties to communicate and engage with voters, as well as the importance of freedom of political communication,” the submission states.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |